Market X-Ray · Toolbox 7

Market-Structure Anomaly Score

A single weak ratio is a normal alert. This asks the higher-level question: is today's whole combination of internals — participation, concentration, credit, size and factor/beta — historically unusual? It scores the standardised multivariate distance of today's configuration against the engine's own ~3-year history. This is the 63-day structural lens — distinct from the short-term cracks on the Regime page.

Updated daily · data as of 2026-08-28

65 th pct
mild No structural anomaly Bullish Lifecycle: Quiet · rising — 65th now vs 49th 5d ago

Today's market structure reads only mildly unusual (65th percentile of abnormality across 5 dimensions) — no notable multivariate anomaly right now. Internals are roughly where the headline would suggest.

What drives it — five dimensions

Each internal dimension's recent move, standardised against its own history (z). The anomaly is the multivariate distance — how far today's whole vector sits from the norm, not any single dimension.

Breadth z +1.36

broadening participation

Concentration z +0.74

near its norm

Credit z +0.28

near its norm

Small-cap z -0.06

near its norm

High-beta z +0.50

near its norm

Statistical context

Abnormality65th pct
For this regime70th pct
Distance · Mahalanobis1.05
Shrinkage λ0.05
History721bars

How to read it

Five internal dimensions — breadth (RSP/SPY), concentration (ex-Mag-7/SPY), credit (HYG/LQD), small-cap (IWM/SPY) and factor/beta (SPHB/SPLV) — are each measured as a recent ratio move and standardised against ~3 years of their own history. The anomaly is the Mahalanobis distance across all five: how far today's combined configuration sits from its norm given how these internals normally co-move. A divergence between dimensions that usually move together — say small-caps rising while breadth narrows — therefore reads as more unusual than either move alone, while a shared move counts once rather than several times. The quadratic form decomposes additively, so each dimension's contribution % is its correlation-aware share of the distance; the covariance is shrunk toward the identity (Schäfer–Strimmer λ) for stability. Direction flags whether the abnormality is a firm-index-over-weak-internals warning or an improving-internals recovery; lifecycle tracks whether it is new, worsening, persisting or resolving. The percentile self-recalibrates to the metric, but the 50/70/85/95 bands remain uncalibrated pending backtest — directional, not exact.

For information and discussion only — a reading of market internals, not investment advice. Feeds the Daily Read; pairs with Regime Baselines and the Cross-Toolbox Alert Stack.

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-08-28

Quick answers

What does the Market-Structure Anomaly Score measure?

It asks whether today’s whole combination of market internals — participation, concentration, credit, small-caps and factor/beta — is historically unusual, not whether any single ratio is weak. The score is the standardised multivariate (Mahalanobis) distance of today’s configuration against the engine’s own roughly three-year history.

What is the Anomaly Score right now?

As of 2026-08-28, the Anomaly Score sits at the 65th percentile, labeled "mild" and classified as a "No structural anomaly" type, direction "Bullish".

Which dimension is driving the anomaly the most?

As of 2026-08-28, Breadth contributes the largest share of the distance at 102%, with a z-score of +1.36.

What is the current lifecycle status of the anomaly?

As of 2026-08-28, the anomaly’s lifecycle status is "Quiet" (trend: rising).