Aurizon Holdings Ltd (AZJ.AU) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-18 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

53 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 73
Quality 42
Growth 49
Balance sheet 26
Cash quality 70
Capital allocation 90
Momentum 37

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

1.15 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the distress zone (below 1.81). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

7/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-1.31 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the AZJ.AU chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-18

Quick answers

What is Aurizon Holdings Ltd's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 53/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-18: valuation 73, quality 42, growth 49, balance sheet 26, cash quality 70, capital allocation 90, momentum 37. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Aurizon Holdings Ltd's Altman Z-Score?

1.15, which sits in the distress zone (below 1.81) as of 2026-09-18. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Aurizon Holdings Ltd's Piotroski F-Score?

7 of 9, as of 2026-09-18. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Aurizon Holdings Ltd's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-1.31 — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk, as of 2026-09-18. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelook universe

then Railroads, then Industrials. Scored names rank on their Closelook score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.