Trade the Look
The diary’s books, as wikifolios
Closelooknet writes an investment diary. Four wikifolios — public model portfolios on wikifolio.com — are where the diary’s books are run in the open, every position and every change visible in real time: “Core and Conviction”, the barbell book; “AI Cycle 2030”, the three-phase AI cycle; “Global Generation”, the broad-distribution core that sits on the other side of the same barbell; and “The Compound”, the growth book with no tech inside, still in its test phase. This page describes the trading ideas behind them; it is not a recommendation of any kind.
How this works — who runs what
The wikifolios “Core and Conviction”, “AI Cycle 2030”, “Global Generation” and “The Compound” are model portfolios managed personally by Thomas Look — as an individual, not by a company. Thomas Look is managing partner of Closelook Venture GmbH, the operator of closelook.net; the wikifolios are a personal engagement, not a company product, and Thomas Look does not work for wikifolio. This page talks about the wikifolios and the trading ideas behind them only. Everything else — status, figures, fees and all product information — is on wikifolio.com, never on this site.
Die wikifolios „Core and Conviction“, „AI Cycle 2030“, „Global Generation“ und „The Compound“ sind Musterdepots, die Thomas Look persönlich führt — als Privatperson, nicht durch ein Unternehmen. Thomas Look ist Managing Partner der Closelook Venture GmbH, der Betreiberin von closelook.net; die wikifolios sind ein persönliches Engagement, kein Unternehmensprodukt, und Thomas Look ist kein Mitarbeiter von wikifolio. Diese Seite beschreibt ausschließlich die wikifolios und ihre Handelsideen. Status, Kennzahlen, Gebühren und alle Produktinformationen stehen auf wikifolio.com.
Core and Conviction · the barbell book · wf000look1
The trading idea
Core and Conviction combines two ideas. The first: in the US and elsewhere, a small number of stocks in an index has at times produced most of the stock market’s long-run return. The second: a trend-based reading of the market regime. Together they make a barbell — an index-oriented base on one side, and concentrated positions in structurally selected single stocks on the other, chosen by regime but usually weighted towards technology.
Building blocks
Broad-market, regional and thematic ETFs are combined with selected single stocks. The holdings fall into three kinds: Core — own it, do not trade it; Swing — a core position held for the longer run, with the trading share periodically reduced or increased; and Situational — pure, rather short-term trading positions.
Horizon
The stated investment horizon is short-term. Positions are bought, held and closed — no leverage, no derivatives. Changes are visible on wikifolio in real time.
Composition · weights at the October 7 close · our own calculation · live weights on wikifolio
| Stocks · 7 · 56.7% | |
|---|---|
| Advantest | 10.6% |
| Nvidia | 9.6% |
| Palantir | 9.4% |
| TSMC (ADR) | 9.2% |
| SK Hynix (GDR) | 8.2% |
| Cloudflare | 5.0% |
| Robinhood | 4.8% |
| ETFs · 7 · 43.1% (cash 0.2%) | |
|---|---|
| iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF | 9.8% |
| Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF | 9.2% |
| Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 8.7% |
| WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF | 6.6% |
| Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF | 5.9% |
| Defiance Memory UCITS ETF | 1.5% |
| Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF | 1.4% |
AI Cycle 2030 · the three-phase AI cycle · WF0AICYCLE
The trading idea
AI Cycle 2030 is mainly short-term and focused on the AI complex. Its speculative trading idea follows a three-phase, overlapping AI cycle: 1) AI capex and physical bottlenecks, 2) AI opex revenues and 3) AI applications — money first goes into building the capacity, then into running it, then into what is built on top. Whether the cycle unfolds this way cannot be guaranteed.
Universe and diversification
Stocks and ETFs available on wikifolio, usually companies that in the diary’s view take part in the AI build-out directly or indirectly. The book is meant to diversify broadly inside the AI complex and usually holds more than 30 single names; the current count can differ.
The regime switch
A regime analysis sets the trend view and the equity share. When it points to higher stock-market risk, larger parts can move into money-market ETFs or short-dated bond ETFs, usually with maturities of about one to three years, to reduce equity risk for a time — these ETFs can fluctuate too. When the regime looks more favourable for stocks, those positions are reduced or closed again in favour of stocks and equity ETFs. The bond-half logic behind it is in the Daily Pulse 60/40 — Not Dead, the Bond Part Needs a Regime.
Selection and horizon
Decisions rest on fundamental and technical analysis: annual reports, quarterly results, technology roadmaps, industry and market data. Selection weighs market position, AI revenue, pricing power, earnings revisions, valuation and relative strength. Most changes happen within a year, so the stated horizon is short-term; single strategic positions can be held longer while their thesis holds. No leverage, no derivatives.
Composition · weights at the October 7 close · our own calculation · live weights on wikifolio
| Stocks · 44 · 86.0% | |
|---|---|
| Samsung Electronics (GDR) | 3.6% |
| Advantest | 2.7% |
| Lumentum | 2.4% |
| Nvidia | 2.2% |
| Broadcom | 2.2% |
| Palantir | 2.1% |
| MongoDB | 2.1% |
| Meta Platforms | 2.1% |
| Amazon | 2.1% |
| SpaceX | 2.1% |
| Marvell | 2.1% |
| Rubrik | 2.1% |
| Samsara | 2.1% |
| Okta | 2.1% |
| TSMC (ADR) | 2.1% |
| Shopify | 2.1% |
| Alphabet | 2.0% |
| Tokyo Electron | 2.0% |
| ServiceNow | 2.0% |
| ASE Technology | 2.0% |
| Cloudflare | 2.0% |
| SAP | 2.0% |
| Datadog | 2.0% |
| Apple | 2.0% |
| Lenovo | 2.0% |
| Soitec | 2.0% |
| Hut 8 | 2.0% |
| Astera Labs | 1.9% |
| Snowflake | 1.9% |
| CrowdStrike | 1.9% |
| Microsoft | 1.9% |
| Sea Limited | 1.9% |
| DigitalOcean | 1.9% |
| SK Hynix (GDR) | 1.9% |
| Robinhood | 1.8% |
| Synopsys | 1.8% |
| Siemens | 1.8% |
| Linde | 1.8% |
| Nebius | 1.7% |
| BESI | 1.7% |
| Twilio | 1.6% |
| Teradyne | 1.5% |
| Infineon | 0.8% |
| SÜSS MicroTec | 0.2% |
| ETFs · 7 · 13.7% (cash 0.3%) | |
|---|---|
| Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 2.4% |
| Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF | 2.4% |
| Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF | 2.2% |
| L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF | 1.9% |
| Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF | 1.8% |
| Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 1.7% |
| Defiance Memory UCITS ETF | 1.4% |
Global Generation · the distribution · WFETFGEN01
The trading idea
Global Generation is run globally and with ETFs only. Its basis is Hendrik Bessembinder’s US and global studies, together with German research, finding that a small number of stocks has historically accounted for a disproportionate share of long-run wealth creation. Broad diversification is the way to own those winners without having to pick them in advance.
Building blocks
In market phases the diary judges stable, the book holds mainly equity ETFs. The core is an all-country world ETF with its high US weight plus a world index without the US. Around it sit small- and mid-cap, Nasdaq, thematic, commodity and single-country ETFs — for example, but not only, semiconductors, AI opex and cloud, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Poland or Switzerland. Germany and continental Europe can carry a lower weight, depending on the market regime.
The regime switch
In defensive phases larger parts can move into money-market ETFs or short-dated bond ETFs, usually with maturities of about one to three years; when the regime turns more favourable they are reduced again. The regime is read from the market trend, relative strength, market breadth and moving averages — the same bond-half logic as in the Daily Pulse 60/40 — Not Dead, the Bond Part Needs a Regime.
Selection and holding period
ETFs are chosen for coverage, costs, index quality, diversification, liquidity and tradability; accumulating funds are usually preferred, and thematic ETFs need a long-term structural development behind them. Only ETFs available on wikifolio are traded. Strategic positions can be held for many years; tactical positions are usually adjusted within a year, which is why the stated investment horizon is short-term. No leverage, no derivatives.
Composition · weights at the October 7 close · our own calculation · live weights on wikifolio
| ETFs · 20 · 99.8% | |
|---|---|
| Amundi MSCI Semiconductors UCITS ETF | 9.2% |
| Xtrackers FTSE All-World ex US UCITS ETF | 8.4% |
| Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF | 7.4% |
| SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 7.2% |
| WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF | 6.9% |
| iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF | 6.4% |
| Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF | 6.4% |
| Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF | 6.4% |
| Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF | 6.4% |
| Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 5.7% |
| ETFs, continued · cash 0.2% | |
|---|---|
| iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF | 4.4% |
| WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF | 3.9% |
| Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF | 3.7% |
| Invesco Cybersecurity UCITS ETF | 3.5% |
| Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF | 3.4% |
| UBS ETF (IE) Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF | 3.3% |
| iShares AEX UCITS ETF | 3.1% |
| Amundi Core Stoxx Europe 600 UCITS ETF | 2.9% |
| Other ETF | 0.8% |
| Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF | 0.4% |
The caveat inside the framework
Bessembinder’s evidence assumes public markets capture the bulk of equity wealth creation. That assumption needs watching. Databricks, OpenAI, Anthropic and SpaceX all have enough private liquidity to stay private more or less indefinitely, at marks the public market has not had the chance to set — and there is precedent for a long stretch where the compounding happened off-exchange, in the 2000–2015 window when the IPO door narrowed and Google arrived in 2004 and Meta not until 2012. The argument for owning the public-market distribution stays valid; the claim that it captures all of the wealth creation is the part that needs monitoring.
The Compound · growth with no tech inside · wf0thecomp
The trading idea
The Compound is a global growth book away from the dominant Big-Tech and AI names. It is built from three blocks — roughly a third ETFs, a third mega-cap growth stocks, a third mid-cap growth stocks. That split is an orientation, not a fixed allocation; it moves with the market and with where the opportunities are.
Strategic core positions are combined with tactical ones. The core is meant to benefit from long-run growth and the compounding of rising earnings; the tactical positions use valuation discounts, market overreactions, sector rotation or company-specific events.
Universe
Only stocks and ETFs available on wikifolio, from developed markets and selected emerging markets. Likely centres of gravity: health care, industrials, infrastructure, consumer, financials, energy and specialised market leaders. Using technology does not exclude a company — the thesis just must not depend mainly on the AI trade.
Criteria
For stocks: durable growth in revenue, earnings and cash flow, sound balance sheets, high returns on capital, competitive advantages, pricing power, management quality and a reasonable valuation. Tactical positions may also weigh momentum, sentiment, price trends and near-term catalysts. For ETFs: index construction, regional and sector weights, concentration, costs and liquidity. Position sizes follow quality, valuation, liquidity and the balance of opportunity and risk.
Holding period
From several weeks to several years. Tactical positions are usually held for shorter periods; strategic core positions can stay in the book for the long run. Stocks and ETFs only — no leverage, no derivatives. The editorial home of this book is the Hypergrowth letter’s Growth With No Tech Inside section and the Weekly Signal of August 23.
Composition · weights at the October 7 close · our own calculation · live weights on wikifolio
| Stocks · 12 · 56.2% | |
|---|---|
| Goldman Sachs | 5.5% |
| Siemens | 5.3% |
| Eli Lilly | 5.2% |
| Robinhood | 5.2% |
| Allianz | 4.9% |
| Rolls-Royce | 4.9% |
| Siemens Energy | 4.5% |
| Berkshire Hathaway | 4.5% |
| Airbus | 4.2% |
| Fast Retailing | 4.2% |
| Nu Holdings | 4.1% |
| Netflix | 3.7% |
| ETFs · 11 · 43.6% (cash 0.1%) | |
|---|---|
| Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 7.3% |
| Bitwise Core Bitcoin ETP | 5.1% |
| iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF | 4.8% |
| iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF | 4.5% |
| Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF | 4.3% |
| SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF | 3.7% |
| Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF | 3.5% |
| Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF | 3.4% |
| SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF | 3.3% |
| Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF | 2.7% |
| Other ETF | 1.0% |
The rules of the books
All four wikifolios invest in stocks and ETFs from wikifolio’s eligible universe — a broad but limited pool. There is no options overlay, no derivatives, no short positions: positions are bought, held and closed. The strategies are run under those constraints, with the same discipline the diary applies everywhere else.
Our own benchmarks · since each wikifolio’s start · as of 2026-10-12
Each wikifolio is compared with the index we chose for it ourselves — the market its trading idea has to beat. These are Closelooknet’s own comparisons, not benchmarks set by wikifolio or anyone else.
| wikifolio | Start | Since start | Benchmark | Since start | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core and Conviction | 20 Jul 2026 | +9.3% | Nasdaq-100 iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (Acc) | +8.9% | +0.3 pp |
| AI Cycle 2030 | 25 Jul 2026 | +20.2% | Nasdaq Global AI & Big Data Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF 1C also: Rubin Build-Out EW + Agentic Winners 40 EW, 50/50, in EUR +17.7% | +16.2% | +4.0 pp |
| Global Generation | 2 Aug 2026 | +6.6% | FTSE All-World Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc) | +6.1% | +0.5 pp |
| The Compound | 18 Aug 2026 | +1.1% | MSCI World Equal Weighted Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (Acc) also: Nasdaq-100 ex Technology (QQXT), in EUR −1.8% | −0.6% | +1.6 pp |
Our own comparison. wikifolio: its level, index 100 on the creation day. Benchmark: an ETF on the named index, in euros, rebased to 100 on the same day; second lines: for AI Cycle 2030 a 50/50 mix of our Rubin Build-Out and Agentic Winners 40 equal-weight indices, for The Compound the Nasdaq-100 without its technology companies (QQXT), both in euros. Past values, less than twelve months of history — no indicator of future results, no promise and no forecast.
An investment diary, not investment advice. Neither Thomas Look nor Closelook Venture GmbH (operator of closelook.net) is a licensed investment adviser; nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or financial product, and nothing here is a promise or forecast. Performance figures, where shown, are past values and no indicator of future results. Product information is available on wikifolio.com only.