—
C+
C+ The full Closelook — membership. Open the C+ overview

Energy Fuels Inc (EFR.TO) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-18 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

36 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

3.85 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the safe zone (above 2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

3/8 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.02 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the EFR.TO chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-18

Quick answers

What is Energy Fuels Inc's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 36/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-18: valuation 17, quality 12, growth 65, balance sheet 79, cash quality 31, capital allocation 25, momentum 3. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Energy Fuels Inc's Altman Z-Score?

3.85, which sits in the safe zone (above 2.99) as of 2026-09-18. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Energy Fuels Inc's Piotroski F-Score?

3 of 8, as of 2026-09-18. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Energy Fuels Inc's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.02 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-09-18. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelook universe

then Uranium, then Energy. Scored names rank on their Closelook score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.