Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-18 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

55 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 53
Quality 71
Growth 59
Balance sheet 68
Cash quality 31
Capital allocation 41
Momentum 37

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

6.68 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the safe zone (above 2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

6/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-1.26 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the LUN.TO chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-18

Quick answers

What is Lundin Mining Corporation's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 55/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-18: valuation 53, quality 71, growth 59, balance sheet 68, cash quality 31, capital allocation 41, momentum 37. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Lundin Mining Corporation's Altman Z-Score?

6.68, which sits in the safe zone (above 2.99) as of 2026-09-18. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Lundin Mining Corporation's Piotroski F-Score?

6 of 9, as of 2026-09-18. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Lundin Mining Corporation's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-1.26 — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk, as of 2026-09-18. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelook universe

then Copper, then Basic Materials. Scored names rank on their Closelook score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.