—
C+
C+ The full Closelook — membership. Open the C+ overview

Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership (QSP-UN.TO) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-18 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

51 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

1.84 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

8/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.58 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the QSP-UN.TO chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-18

Quick answers

What is Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 51/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-18: valuation 44, quality 65, growth 57, balance sheet 28, cash quality 57, capital allocation 44, momentum 55. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership's Altman Z-Score?

1.84, which sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99) as of 2026-09-18. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership's Piotroski F-Score?

8 of 9, as of 2026-09-18. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.58 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-09-18. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelook universe

then Restaurants, then Consumer Cyclical. Scored names rank on their Closelook score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.