Mag Pulse · daily board · the Six plus the Torque · as of Aug 28, 2026

Mag Pulse

One question, answered daily: is the hyperscaler cohort turning? The Mag complex spent ~19 months going sideways on capex fear while nearly every benchmark ran. This week's cloud prints put booked demand against that fear — this board keeps the score. Six names in three cohorts, one torque row, and the popular instrument (MAGS) as the shared price frame. Tesla is excluded by methodology.

The regime-turn line Hyperscalers ÷ Consumer-AI · equal-weight · indexed 1y

1.001.161.32 25-0925-1226-0326-06 1.22
1D +0.90%1W -1.29%1M +9.12%1Y +20.71%

Rising = the market pays the build-out cohort over the consumer-AI cohort. The line is the board's headline read: a durable turn here is what "the discount is closing" looks like in price.

The MAGS map popular-instrument foil · standing levels

69.50 shelf 62.56 pivot ~56 trend 25-0925-1226-0326-06 69.07
Close 69.07 to 69.50 +0.62% to 62.56 -9.43% to ~56 -18.92%

Ten-month compression: flat top at the 69.50 supply shelf (two rejections), rising floor on the multi-year trendline (~56, hand-set monthly), pivot 62.56 = the Dec-2024 top on price. Levels first, story second.

The cohorts

Hyperscalers
1D +2.39%1W +2.66%1M +8.96%1Y +29.33%
1Y vs QQQ: +3.80%

MSFT · AMZN · GOOGL — the thesis longs: does the cohort close the gap?

Consumer-AI
1D +1.47%1W +4.00%1M -0.16%1Y +7.14%
1Y vs QQQ: -18.39%

META · AAPL — not yet in the build-out cycle; edge-AI optionality

Supplier
1D -4.57%1W +1.32%1M +11.54%1Y +19.96%
1Y vs QQQ: -5.57%

NVDA — the anchor between build-out and deployment

Torque
1D -0.72%1W +2.99%1M +18.26%1Y -35.52%
1Y vs QQQ: -61.05%

ORCL — highest-beta hyperscaler pivot; thesis amplifier both ways

The Six absolute + relative, Aug 28, 2026 close

Name Cohort Close 1D1W1M1Y 1Y vs QQQ 1Y vs MAGS Record
MSFT Hyperscalers 513.53 +1.68%+6.27%+13.84%+1.76% -23.77% -14.39% print record
AMZN Hyperscalers 266.43 +3.97%+3.02%+13.13%+16.28% -9.25% +0.13% print record
GOOGL Hyperscalers 346.59 +1.74%+0.51%+3.88%+67.42% +41.89% +51.27% print record
META Consumer-AI 578.02 +1.21%+5.11%+7.23%-22.48% -48.01% -38.63% print record
AAPL Consumer-AI 319.70 +1.63%+3.35%-4.12%+38.97% +13.44% +22.82% print record
NVDA Supplier 217.55 -4.57%+1.32%+11.54%+19.96% -5.57% +3.81% print record

The Torque · ORCL separated by design — the thesis amplifier, both ways

Close 150.85 1D -0.72% · 1W +2.99% · 1M +18.26% · 1Y -35.52%
Below the Sep-2025 high -53.53% high 324.63 on 2025-09-10 — the deepest drawdown in the complex
1M realized vol 49.7% cohort median 37.5% — the most volatile seat at the table

The torque: hyperscaler-since-recently, declined the most, most volatile in both directions. If the thesis holds, the biggest move lives here.

Benchmarks the field the Six are measured against

Instrument Close 1D1W1M1Y
QQQ 716.43 -0.65%+0.42%+4.81%+25.53%
SPY 769.35 -0.23%+0.47%+3.73%+20.30%
SOXX 508.62 -3.20%-2.20%+0.81%+103.31%
XLK 185.69 -1.55%+1.30%+5.67%+41.17%
IGV 109.50 -0.74%+5.93%+17.35%+1.93%
MAGS · the foil 69.07 +0.69%+2.66%+8.06%+16.15%

The thesis layer the standing read per name — editorial, updated on evidence

MSFT

The capex-fear discount, refuted where it was priced deepest: Azure +43%, $678B backlog — the market paid the print +15% in a day.

AMZN

AWS re-accelerated to +37% — the demand witness. The biggest print reaction in its record parked it directly under the all-time-high line.

GOOGL

The straddle: cloud yes, search disruption already visible — and AI replacement monetizes less well. Re-rated in sympathy without printing.

META

Excellent at AI-for-ads — but that is not genAI. Charged hardest of the Six for strategy-push capex without a booked-demand anchor.

AAPL

Waiting to monetize reach, with the tail risk that a new AI interface takes reach away from mobile. The cost repricing hit its margin story first.

NVDA

The supplier both cohorts pay either way — priced on workloads, not orders; the boundary name between build-out and deployment.

Methodology

Universe: six Mag names in three cohorts — Hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL), Consumer-AI (META, AAPL), Supplier (NVDA) — plus Oracle as a visually separated torque row. Tesla is excluded by stated methodology: not a Mag company for this monitor — its price is set by autonomy and robotics narratives, not by the cloud/AI build-out economics this board measures.

Computation: cohort composites are equal-weight within cohort. All windows (1D/1W/1M/1Y) are trading-day windows on adjusted closes. Relatives are simple return differences against each benchmark (QQQ, SPY, SOXX, XLK, IGV) plus MAGS as the popular-instrument foil. The headline line is the hyperscaler composite divided by the consumer-AI composite, indexed over one year — the regime-turn detector.

The MAGS map is a standing frame, not a computed one: the 69.50 supply shelf and 62.56 pivot (the Dec-17-2024 top on price basis) are fixed levels; the multi-year trendline (~56) is hand-set and updated monthly.

Data: equities from the Closelook data lake; benchmark ETFs from EODHD. Refreshed nightly after the US close (22:30 UTC, Mon–Fri).

This board is a diary entry on our process. Closelook publishes research, not investment advice.

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-08-28

Quick answers

What does Mag Pulse track?

Mag Pulse is a daily board on six "Mag" companies split into three cohorts — Hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL), Consumer-AI (META, AAPL) and Supplier (NVDA) — plus Oracle tracked separately as a high-beta "torque" name. Tesla is excluded by methodology: its price is driven by autonomy and robotics narratives, not cloud/AI build-out economics. See the Capex Cliff 101 for the thesis behind the board. As of Aug 28, 2026.

How has the Hyperscalers-versus-Consumer-AI ratio moved over the past year?

As of Aug 28, 2026, the equal-weight Hyperscalers ÷ Consumer-AI ratio moved +20.71% over the trailing year (1D +0.90%, 1M +9.12%). A rising ratio means the market is paying the build-out cohort over the consumer-AI cohort — the board's regime-turn detector.

Which of the Six has performed best and worst over the past year?

As of Aug 28, 2026, the strongest 1-year performer among the Six is GOOGL at +67.42%, and the weakest is META at -22.48%.

Where does MAGS trade relative to its key levels?

MAGS closed at 69.07 as of Aug 28, 2026, which is +0.62% from the 69.50 supply shelf, -9.43% from the 62.56 pivot, and -18.92% from the ~56 trendline.

How volatile is ORCL relative to the rest of the cohort?

As of Aug 28, 2026, ORCL's one-month realized volatility was 49.7%, versus a cohort median of 37.5% — the most volatile seat at the table. ORCL is -53.53% below its Sep-2025 high of 324.63 (set 2025-09-10).